
Dear Sirs:
I just wanted to write this to let you know how much we appreciate the work youhave done on your flagship product, TargetProcess. We have been a user of TP sincethe early 1.x versions and have consistently been impressed with both the product'scapabilities and the responsiveness of your overall organization to our needs andfeedback.
When my company originally went looking for an agile-development-style project managementtool, we quickly narrowed the candidates down to two camps: those tools that werevery heavy-handed and superimposed significant forced structure on the process andthose that were just too light-weight to be of any value at all. TargetProcess surprisedus by capably straddling the line between a flexible, light-weight tool the one-handand enough of a structure to provide useful management feedback on the other. Forour organization, looking for a tool flexible enough to allow us to manage all ofour very different types of projects but powerful enough to actually add value toour project methodology, TargetProcess hit the sweet-spot for us quite well.
In the intervening year or more since our adoption of TargetProcess, we have seenthe software mature and contiune to grow quite quickly both in re: usability andin re: capabilities. We have seen the complete backend rewrite to leverage NHibernatein the datalayer; we have seen the USEFUL introduction of AJAX-style controls inthe UI to actually improve the usability of the application instead of just addinguseless eye-candy to the browser; we have seen the introduction of test cases, theaddition of support for pair-programming in assigning mutiple developers to a singletask, and the introduction of the customizable 'dashboard' concept to give eachuser a snapshot view of their pending work. We are eager to see where TP goes nextin adding value to the application, but we are confident that it will be in a directionthat continues to add both useful tools to our development and testing staff aswell as business value to our project managers and project leads.
We had two initial concerns when first evaluating TargetProcess and thus far bothhave proven complete non-issues. The first was the relative size of the companybehind the product; would a smaller organization be able to provide us a high enoughlevel of support for what we envisioned would be a critical tool in our workflow?The second was the relative feature-set of the product; how likley was the companyto continue to add value to the product over time, making our investment in theyearly support contract worth more than just a single annual bug-fix release?
The first concern re: the level of support has proven to us that a smaller companythat remains customer-focused is more than able to respond to our needs in a timelyfashion. When we report a bug in the product, we receive confirmation within anhour or two at most and a fix is usually released within 24 hours that addressesour issue. When we did the migration from the 1.x product to the 2.x product andthe originally-provided database migration tool failed to adequately migrate aspectsof the 1.x system that we considered critical to our continued use of the product,TargetProcess released a reworked migration tool within only a few days that completelyaddressed our issue. For anyone concerned about the company's ability to respondadequately to legitimate needs for support, I say you can put those concerns torest.
The second concern re: the committment to extend the product over time has alsoproven exactly the reverse. Our company uses several tools that have an annual supportcomponent and often the question of 'what do we get for our support dollars' comesup. With most products, the best we can hope for is perhaps a single maintenancerelease in that year. With TargetProcess, their release cycle has been extrementagressive, leading to new features, added capabilities, and steady improvementsto their product at quite regular and very frequent intervals throughout the year(s).We routinely receive excellent additional business value from the new features thatthey add to the product over time. In the same time that several other agile managementtool vendors have released perhaps only a single upgrade, TargetProcess has releasedfour. This style of shorter-duration, more-frequent, incremental release fits nicelywith the agile development style and demonstrates to me that the company has notonly decided to develop a tool that supports an agile approach, but also that theyare committed to performing their own work within this same framework and style.
In short, our relationship with TargetProcess over time has been a great experiencefor us, completely validating our choice to move forward to implement their product.The software continues to evolve and add value to our process, they continue tobe extremely responsive to our needs, and we continue to look forward to the nextreleases in justifiable expectation that the next feature will also add considerablebusiness value to our ability to manage our projects in a manner that ensures ourcompany's continued success.
Stephen A. Bohlen
Senior Project Manager/Software Architect Software Development Group.Microdesk, Inc.